Monday, April 20, 2009

Magneto & the Holocaust

Magneto Testament delves into the background and childhood of Erik Magnus Lehnsherr, a Jewish boy from Germany who survived the Holocaust and would one day become the villain Magneto. He is born Max Eisenhardt, though, which is the first unresolved mystery. Why wouldn't he keep that name or change his name to something less...Jewish? You would think to escape the Nazis, he'd change it to something that would be less identifying...but no; that wasn't the case and we, the readers, were never told why.

Although I found the story enjoyable and moving, I was a little disappointed in the mini-series as a whole. I think my expectations were higher for the book because of its (supposed) powerful storyline, the beautiful covers, and $3.99 per issue price tag. Unfortunately, if the cover didn't say "Magneto" on it, one would never know that the comic was about this X-Men villain rather than some other boy during the Holocaust. Besides the names being different (and, again, we weren't given an explanation about the name change), the story sped along so fast that it read just like a Holocaust timeline with not a lot of depth to the characters. We didn't have a chance to learn about the characters as much as I had hoped to, including Magneto and his family. It seemed that while a lot of time was put into researching the Holocaust to ensure the events were accurate, not a lot of time was spent researching and developing Magneto himself. There was no indication of the development of his powers either. There was perhaps a tiny clue when his entire family was riddled with bullets but he wasn't, but not enough attention was paid to it.

Magneto is a truly unique and tragic character in the Marvel Universe and it's disappointing that he wasn't given his full due in what could/should have been an epic tale of the Holocaust and the specific events that shaped this boy into the powerful and hate-filled
villain Magneto. I'd have to give the idea of this series five stars (out of five), but the execution of the story only three stars, as it was merely average for the way-too-important subject matter.

Monday, April 13, 2009

Smegma Flight

As a kid/teen in the 1980s, I used to love to read Alpha Flight by John Byrne. Byrne had the most creative ideas and could take minor characters and turn them into the most interesting people with distinct personalities. He did so with the Uncanny X-Men, Fantastic Four, and then Alpha Flight. Guardian? Puck? Snowbird? Northstar? Aurora? Sasquatch? Marina? "Who are these characters?" you might have asked yourself back then. Suddenly, they're starring in their own comic book, though, and you oddly get to know (and love) each and every one of them. That's the work of a great writer.

What's the work of a bad writer? See the 2007 Alpha Flight revamp called Omega Flight. What I thought would be the bringing together of some great characters was basically the equivalent of Howard the Duck meets the Avengers. Captain America? Check. There's the copycat and pointless U.S. Agent. Spider-Man? Check. There's a Spider-Woman knock-off by the name of Arachne. Hulk? Check. There's Sasquatch...but not the one with any sort of personality that we once knew. Thor? Check. In the form of Beta Ray Bill, a bird-like version of the God of Thunder. Yes, I did say "bird-like." They're what would happen if Marvel lost the licensing rights to the Avengers and had to come up with "similar" characters. Did I mention Omega Flight isn't even frickin' Canadian anymore? Eh?

And what a pointless and dreadful storyline they have to go through after they band together. You almost feel sorry for these characters, but not enough to still want to see their demise (which, unfortunately, (SPOILER!) never occurs). Skip Smegma Flight and re-read Alpha Flight from the 1980s. Maybe someday Marvel will have the decency to treat Alpha Flight with some class again.

Friday, February 27, 2009

Black Adam

The Black Adam mini series (2008) was one of the first comic arcs that I read upon my return to comics after a 15-year absence. Why? I've always had a fondness for the Marvel Family that dates back to the 1970s. Now, I'm not talking about Marvel Comics. I'm talking about the Marvels: Captain Marvel (Shazam), Mary Marvel, Captain Marvel Jr., etc. Growing up, I used to love watching the Shazam! live-action series that came on every Saturday morning. To a young kid, it was way cool. Now, I don't recall if Black Adam was ever on the TV show (I don't think he was), but since I was happy to see one of the members of the Marvel family currently being used by DC Comics, I picked up the entire Black Adam: The Dark Age series to give it a shot. I was given an even sweeter treat when I discovered that the series also featured Isis ("Oh mighty Isis"). Come to find out, DC had, after all these years, created (and killed) an Isis character based on the Shazam! show's sister show Isis. Woo hoo! How psyched was I?

In the mini series, Black Adam is mad as hell at the world (and he's not going to take it anymore). He wants the love of his life, Isis, back. Dammit. And he'll kill anyone (and does) to get her back. Yes, Black Adam is evil and a murderer in all senses of the words, and quite possibly could be considered a terrorist. So imagine an entire mini series revolving around his character?

The story takes place in mythical countries in the war-torn Middle East, and the violence is astounding (yet necessary and purposefully used to tell the story). In fact, the story was SO well written by Peter Tomasi that I actually felt sorry for Black Adam. (Of course I had my own selfish reasons for wanting Isis back alive.) The art by Doug Mahnke
was amazing, too. He really brought the story (and violence) to life. Now if only we could get these two to do a Black Adam continuing series with the same murder, mayhem, and terror. Oh, and love. Ah, l'amour...

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Thursday, February 19, 2009

Filler

Filler. Yup. That's what DC Comics' Faces of Evil "event" is.

Using only a handful of writers (e.g., Geoff Johns, Gail Simone) on their regular staff instead of employing more talent (they won't even consider submissions for writers), DC has gotten behind in producing comics on schedule. So what's a comic company to do? Stage an "event." In this case, it happens to be the well-intentioned, great-on-paper, and poorly executed Faces of Evil concept. I've found that besides not really being about the villains' points of view, most Faces of Evil stories across the DC Comics' comics aren't even part of the current storyline. And basically...suck. Why? They're using "guest" writers and artists to fill the spots so the regular writers and artists get some time to catch up on their work.

Case in point, I just finished Justice League of America #29. This story --surprisingly-- actually was from the villain's point of view. Which villain, you ask? Starbreaker? Who? Um...Star...breaker? Starbreaker first appeared in Justice Leaague of America (vol. 1) #96 in 1972. Wow. That's a pretty generic name, you may say to yourself. And you'd be
right. A pretty generic name, a pretty generic villain, and a pretty generic story. In fact, reading JLA #29, I felt like I was actually reading a comic book from the 1970s (note: that's not a good thing). There was the cheesy, generic villain; the cheesy, generic dialogue; and the cheesy, generic battle sequence. My brain hurt from reading JLA #29.

I'm very disappointed in DC Comics' execution of Faces of Evil. It was an "event" I was looking forward to, but ended up being sadly disappointed in. So much for the villains getting their day in the sun. Perhaps they should have hired some "new" talent who could have actually done something special instead of just providing "filler."